top of page

GEICO: Commercial Vehicle Illustrations

The Overview

For the first time, GEICO’s commercial policyholders could report claims online, and the project required box truck illustrations to help them select damaged areas.

Read Time

8 Minutes

Project Duration

6 Weeks

Platform

Web + Mobile

Team

Graphic Designer (Me), and (PM) Product Managers

Tools

Figma

The Problem

300K+ commercial policyholders lacked an online damage tool.

Personal auto policyholders could select damaged areas using a car image, but this option wasn’t available for commercial policyholders (CPs).

x icon.png

This issue cost the company $30M in adjuster support through calls and chat support

x icon.png

There was no existing commercial illustrations to match the new solution to.

car reference.png

This is today's personal auto damage selector, with the car designed by another UI teammate.

grid reference.png
The Solution

A collection of box truck illustrations with hoverable highlights

To meet stakeholder expectations and maintain GEICO’s branding, I reused the angles and specs from the personal auto damage selector’s car illustrations to create consistent box truck visuals for the commercial damage selector.

check outline.png

Matched the styling of other GEICO vehicle illustrations

check outline.png

Represented damaged areas correctly through blue outlined sections of the box truck

Benchmarking

Exploring what styles to use for the box trucks

During early design stages, I consulted the designer behind GEICO’s personal auto damage selector illustrations. They emphasized keeping vehicle illustrations general, as GEICO couldn’t create tailored visuals for every policyholder’s vehicle type. This lead as my main inspiration.

Illustration Style Explorations

3d truck
3D Models

Lacked GEICO’s brand consistency and I thought it was too complex for customers to select damage areas.

red truck.png
Flat Color Models

Were great in highlighting broader areas of the vehicles, but could not show detailed parts.

white car.png
GEICO’s Existing Style

The current style was minimal yet detailed enough for customers to recognize highlightable areas.

I received an excel sheet and materials outlining what the commercial illustrations needed to reflect. The product manager explained the illustrations would represent all commercial vehicles, meaning CPs with various vehicles would see a single, general illustration.

box side.png
After Benchmarking

What I Learned

Scalability.png
Learn Contraints Early

I saved time by analyzing metrics and consulting product managers, learning box trucks accounted for the majority of commercial claims at GEICO.

KPI.png
Examine Details

Reviewing stakeholder resources ensured every project requirement, like vehicle angles, was fully covered step by step.

Moving forward, After gathering all key insights from stakeholders and the design team, I began ideating the box truck designs. I consistently checked in to ensure branding and illustration details aligned with project goals, creating an efficient feedback loop.

The Final Design

GEICO: Commercial Box Truck Illustrations

left corner.png

Box truck illustrations, that match the current auto policy damage selector car style.

At the time, a platform switch caused the loss of many design assets, leaving me with minimal references—mainly screenshots of other GEICO vehicle illustrations.

check outline.png

Successfully Matched, the old car design to the new style of box trucks

check outline.png

Met stakeholder requirements, created the designs for the highlighted areas of damage

check outline.png

Captured, all necessary angles for the users to select the commons areas of their vehicle

Created in Figma

Freight Liner Box Truck 2012

layer mock.png
Product in use

Demo of the damage selector

One major constraint was time and resources: GEICO couldn’t dynamically change the vehicle type in the commercial damage selector. This meant that regardless of the vehicle policyholders owned — whether a cargo van or pickup truck — they would only see a box truck illustration.

Choosing not to user test for this project, as the damage selector product had already been tested prior, I conducted internal research and learned box trucks made up most commercial claims, making them the best fit for the commercial damage selector experience.

Continuation of Requirements

Representing Damages

Claims TTL/ Box Truck- Front Damages
Claims TTL/ Box Truck- Rear View
Claims TTL/ Box Truck- Left Side

Included in the project requirements were an excel sheet listing each box truck perspective and key specs, such as TTL (Touch Total Loss), GEICO's term for their claims process.

20.png
21.png
22.png
23.png
24.png
25.png
26.png
27.png
28.png
cvn.png
Additional Solutions

Maybe a cargo van would have worked?. . . Internal data showed otherwise.

Initially, I designed a cargo van and suggested the cargo van be used as the general vehicle for the CP damage selector experience, but after the PM took a week to search for the data, they confirmed that box trucks had the most claims.

Future Opportunities

Conclusions & Findings

New design asset collection: Overall I provided a matched and branded collection of box truck illustrations, that CPs now interact with when reporting online claims. This collection is just one of the mainly elements and experiences that will assist GEICO in reducing its $30M adjuster support cost for all of commercial policies.

The Power of Internal Research: This project taught me that I can quickly create effective illustrations by leveraging data and internal insights from developers and stakeholders. However, I recognize that user research is essential for a full 360-degree view of CPs perspectives. In this case, user testing was likely unnecessary, as the damage selector experience had already been validated for personal auto users — the focus here was aligning new box truck illustrations with a proven interaction model.

What would I do differently next time?
1.

Push for user testing, even with the damage selector in place, I’d advocate harder next time for user-testing new illustrations to ensure users fully interpret damage areas based on highlights.

2.

I’d suggest adding more specific damage areas beyond the general sections provided, like left or right headlights, and discuss this refinement with stakeholders.

mouse on fender.png
backend tail.png

Thank you!

Made with love and caffeine
by Marioso Anderson

Smilingpixeloso
  • Behance
  • LinkedIn

© 2025 The Oso Brand, All rights reserved.

bottom of page